Why Most Companies Should Rethink Building Their Own L2 Solutions

September 14, 2025 , , ,

Why Most Companies Should Rethink Building Their Own L2 Solutions

In the ever-evolving landscape of blockchain technology, the conversation surrounding Layer 2 (L2) solutions has reached a fever pitch. As Ethereum continues to dominate the decentralized application space, businesses are increasingly curious about how they can leverage these technologies to enhance their operations. However, Paul Brody, EY’s Global Blockchain Leader, recently emphasized a crucial point: most companies probably don’t need their own L2.

Brody’s insights, shared in a recent opinion piece, highlight a critical but often overlooked aspect of the blockchain expansion strategy. While the idea of developing an L2 network might seem appealing for businesses eager to claim their slice of the blockchain pie, Brody argues that this path is not universally beneficial.

The Appeal of Layer 2 Solutions

Layer 2 solutions are designed to address some of the most pressing issues facing blockchain networks today, primarily scalability and transaction costs. By processing transactions off the main Ethereum chain, L2 solutions can significantly increase transaction throughput and reduce gas fees, making them an attractive option for businesses dealing with high volumes of microtransactions.

For companies with a large user base or those involved in sectors like gaming, supply chain, or DeFi, the benefits of L2 solutions are immediately apparent. These industries often require rapid transaction processing at minimal cost, which L2 solutions can provide.

Who Truly Benefits?

Despite the advantages, Brody’s perspective urges businesses to critically assess their actual need for a bespoke L2 solution. He points out that only companies capable of aggregating significant transaction volume into their network and whose customers cannot make their own direct connection to Ethereum would truly benefit from this approach.

This means that unless a company’s operational framework and business model inherently require a high volume of decentralized transactions that need to be processed efficiently, investing in a dedicated L2 solution could be a misallocation of resources. Moreover, for many companies, existing L2 solutions such as Optimistic Rollups or zk-Rollups already provide robust frameworks that can be integrated without the need for developing a new infrastructure.

The Cost and Complexity of Development

Building an L2 solution is not only financially demanding but also technically complex. It requires a deep understanding of blockchain technology, cryptographic principles, and the specificities of Ethereum’s ecosystem. Companies must consider whether they have the necessary expertise and resources to develop and maintain such a network.

Additionally, the competitive landscape of blockchain technology is rapidly evolving. By the time a bespoke L2 solution is developed and fully operational, market conditions or technological advancements could render it outdated or less competitive compared to existing solutions.

Strategic Alternatives

For companies that determine building their own L2 is not the right path, exploring partnerships with existing L2 providers could be a more strategic move. These partnerships can offer access to advanced L2 technologies without the heavy lifting of development and maintenance, allowing companies to focus on their core business activities.

Furthermore, joining or supporting industry consortia aimed at fostering L2 innovation can provide businesses with a stake in the ecosystem’s growth while mitigating the risks associated with going it alone.

Conclusion

As the blockchain space matures, companies must carefully weigh the benefits and drawbacks of developing their own L2 solutions. Brody’s insights serve as a timely reminder that not every business will benefit from this approach, and pursuing it without a clear, strategic rationale could lead to unnecessary complications and expenses. Instead, aligning with existing solutions or forming strategic alliances may offer a more prudent path to leveraging blockchain’s full potential.


🛒 Recommended Product: Check out top-rated crypto gear on Amazon

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com